| Saturday, November 10, 7:30 p.m. |
Stow
|
| Sunday, November 11, 3:30 p.m. |
Westborough
|
|
This season we pay tribute to several English
composers of the 20th century: Finzi, Walton, Vaughan
Williams and Britten.
And tonight, in particular, we celebrate the centenaries of Finzi
(July 14th) and Walton (next March 29th),
coupled with one of the great staples of the orchestral
repertoire: Brahms’
First Symphony. Indeed,
I’m happy to point out that we have presented works of my countrymen
many times, especially in recent years: two years ago a work by
Butterworth (again coupled with a Brahms symphony); the previous year a song
cycle by Elgar; and
prior to that, Vaughan Williams, Holst, Rutter, Barry, Blake, and
Elgar; not to mention
that in many years (as we will again this year) we have performed
one of the greatest “English” works of all time: Handel’s Messiah.
Sir William Walton (1902-83)
Portsmouth Point Overture (1925)
Walton was
born in Lancashire not far from Manchester and, having served as a
chorister at Christchurch College, Oxford, he went on to be an
undergraduate at age 14. Four years later (it
normally takes three years) he left without a degree, having spent
most of his time with music and very little on academic
studies. At Oxford, he
had become friends with the young Sitwells: Osbert, Sacheverell and
Edith. Not only were
they at the center of intellectual life, but they invited him to
live with them in London, thus relieving him of any financial
difficulties. He
remained with them for ten very important years and in 1922 burst on
the musical scene with Façade, an avant-garde chamber
setting of Edith’s poems — more spoken than sung. To this day, it is one of
his most frequently heard pieces. For the next couple of years
he immersed himself in the jazz idiom. Although he left no examples
of his work from this period, it was an appropriate foundation for
the rhythmic complexities and constant hubbub of tonight’s opener,
the Portsmouth Point Overture. This piece really cemented
the young Walton’s reputation as a composer. His music, which tends to
make big statements, has some influence from Stravinsky, and usually
employs large orchestras or choruses. From this time on he became
part of the musical establishment of England and was knighted in
1951, partly in recognition of his hard work during the war scoring
patriotic films. His
70th birthday was marked by a party hosted by the then
Prime Minister, Edward Heath.
Portsmouth
Point is an overture in the
sense of a short orchestral piece that weaves many themes rapidly
together. It was
inspired by an etching of Thomas Rowlandson (1756-1827) depicting a
rowdy dockside scene in Portsmouth, Britain’s chief naval port. Rowlandson was a satirist
and social commentator who etched huge quantities of copper in his
quest to illuminate the foibles and sorrows of his time. The busy scene has at least
a dozen humorous vignettes that tend to dwell on the seedier side of
the great navy town, in which the pubs were open 24 hours a day and
which was home to significantly more women than men! The scene depicts a time
several years after the great victory at Trafalgar (and the death of
Nelson) and, as it happens, about the time that other social
commentator, Charles Dickens, was born in the town.
The
music Walton wrote to evoke the image of the etching perfectly
mirrors the humor and bustle of the dockside, with about as many
musical figures as there are human figures. The naval association is
underscored by variations on hornpipes and sea shanties while the
general drunkenness is characterized by unusual and rapidly changing
rhythms. It helps to
see a copy of the etching to make sense of this piece - visit our
website at http://www.symphonypromusica.org/
for it, or if you’re ever looking for more information on any of our
programs.
Gerald Finzi (1901-1956)
Cello Concerto, Op. 40 (1955)
Allegro moderato; Andante quieto; Rondò: Adagio-allegro
giocoso
Leaving aside nationality and their contemporaneous births,
Walton and Finzi could hardly have been more different, nor fared so
differently in their lives. Finzi’s Italian Jewish
parents had moved to England not long before he was born, and
turning his back a little on his own heritage, Finzi embraced
everything English, including musical style. His works tend to be
lyrical, introspective and employ smaller forces, particularly song
settings of poetry by Thomas Hardy or Shakespeare. His personality was quiet
and unassuming and he had a reputation for trying to help
others. Compare this to
Walton’s somewhat larger-than-life character and, it has been said,
his rather mercenary attitude to work. Finzi’s war work was as one
of the many unsung, behind-the-scenes civil servants of the war
ministry and as a host to German and Czech refugees. Only in the last quarter
century or so has a resurgence in interest in Finzi’s music arisen,
counterbalancing an occasionally more critical view of the work of
his more illustrious contemporary.
The
Cello Concerto was one of his last projects, commissioned by
Barbirolli and given at the Cheltenham Festival July 19th
1955 by Christopher Bunting and the Hallé Orchestra. It is a work of intense
emotion and power and, if it is derivative of anything, it is
probably the great Elgar concerto. It opens with three
attention-grabbing chords that set the stage for a turbulent
journey. The composer
knew at the time that he was terminally ill and this movement may
have helped vent some of the frustrations he must have felt. Even so, the music is
expressed with great nobility of tone, as soloist and orchestra
engage in a poetic and uplifting conversation.
The
andante quieto begins in the orchestra with a series of
beautiful singing melodies to be answered a little later by the solo
instrument in the peachy part of its range. The last movement is a
thoroughly enjoyable romp, with just an occasional reference back to
the first movement to temper the jollity. It begins with a slow
pizzicato by the cello in octaves, which introduces the main
rondò theme in very slow time. The rhythms of the
allegro are very cleverly managed. A study of the score shows
that the time signature changes frequently, yet to the ear the
result simply flows in the most natural fashion. The concerto closes with a
wonderful brass chorale after which the composer gets the last
laugh.
Johannes Brahms (1833-1897)
Symphony No. 1 in C minor, op. 68 (1862-76)
Un poco sostenuto – allegro; Andante sostenuto; Un poco
allegretto e grazioso; Adagio – più andante – allegro non troppo, ma
con brio.
The story of Brahms and his struggle to create
this first symphony is one of the most frequently discussed aspects
of his life. First,
Schumann had written in his famous paper ‘If he will touch with his
magic wand the strength-giving mass of choral and orchestral tone,
then we may catch an even more wonderful glimpse of the secrets of
the spiritual world’.
Second, he was acutely conscious of the inevitable comparisons that
would be made as he challenged Beethoven on his own ground. ‘You don’t know what it is
like, always to hear that giant marching along behind me’, he
wrote. These were
challenges indeed!
Instead, Brahms concentrated on the chamber music for which,
arguably, he has no match, with the occasional foray into a major
symphonic work of course without attaching the label of First
Symphony. First
attempted was the D minor symphony of 1854-5 which was never
finished but was then used for the first movement of the D minor
Piano Concerto (remember the five-minute introduction before the
soloist plays a note?) and also the German Requiem. Other examples include the
two serenades, the Variations on a Theme of Haydn, and the
Alto Rhapsody.
These gave him a very solid foundation on which to build a
symphony. Even so, its
gestation period was at least fourteen years, and he revised it some
more a year after it was first performed. Once the symphony was “in
the bag”, he embarked upon one of his most productive periods, which
included writing the 2nd symphony (SPM, October
1999) and the Violin concerto.
One of the major obstacles to his progress in the
early years of work on the symphony was that of balance. He had conceived a powerful
and intense first movement and needed a counterbalancing
finale. In 1868 while
in the Alps, he heard or imagined the great Alphorn tune on which
the introduction to that movement is built. (If you heard SPM in
Mahler’s 5th symphony last year, you may recall another
great alphorn-inspired passage from the third movement.) Brahms immediately wrote to
Clara Schumann: ‘Thus blew the shepherd’s horn today: High on the mountain, deep
in the valley, I send you a thousand greetings’.
The symphony was first heard November 4th,
1876 in Karlsruhe, Germany, a great university city, but not the
center of the musical world. Furthermore, Brahms did not
publish the score ahead of time, in order that he might make
alterations. After two
more performances in Mannheim and Munich, the composer was finally
ready to conduct his work in Vienna on December
19th. The
symphony met with rave reviews and was, inevitably, soon hailed as
“Beethoven’s 10th”.
In the end, it seems, Brahms decided to meet
Beethoven’s ghost head on. The first movement (and the
first part of the introduction to the finale) is in C minor, the
home key of Beethoven’s 5th, while the main theme of the
finale has some resemblance to the Freude theme of
Beethoven’s 9th. Brahms famously replied to
the noble gentleman who first observed the similarity: “Yes, and still more
extraordinary that any ass can hear it”.
The first movement, as noted above, has a somewhat
slower introduction (“a little sustained”), which provides a certain
gravity to the movement. Such an introduction, while
normal, or at least common, for Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven, was
unusual for Brahms. In
fact, when he first showed his ideas for the first movement to Clara
years before, there was no introduction. Try to imagine the music
beginning with the sudden allegro at measure 38. Despite being in a
traditionally fatalistic key and its relentless force, the first
movement without that introduction might be somewhat ambivalent,
given the jauntiness of some of the figures.
The second movement, in E major, is a prime example of
Brahms at his most lyrical and serene. The closing solo violin
passages are breathtakingly lovely and give us a taste of what is to
come in the Violin concerto of a few years later.
The third movement, a rather gracious, tranquil
scherzo, is a refreshing entrée (in the French sense,
not the US usage) between weightier movements. There is mild humor here and
a sense of perpetual motion. The clarinet is really the
star of this movement, expounding the main theme at the beginning
and then reverting to dreamy arpeggios when the theme is taken up by
the first violins. The
essential form of the minuet and trio is more or less intact,
although most of the repeats are written out to allow for
variations. The trio
section adds the customary three flats to the key signature,
shifting the key up a minor third from Ab to B. After the equivalent of the
da capo (from the top), the music goes into a coda
(tail) that ends almost without warning in a most elegant and
satisfying way.
The finale begins in dramatic style with the lower
strings and contra-bassoon reprising the first two notes from the
beginning of the symphony but shifted down several octaves. This is immediately answered
in the woodwinds with another falling set of legato (smooth)
chords. A
pizzicato passage in the strings follows, then more woodwind
chords, more pizzicato, then a rising string passage leading
up to the glorious horn call mentioned earlier, which is then echoed
up an octave by the flute. Then comes a
trombone/bassoon chorale. The intensity builds and is
finally relieved by the main theme in the strings (also mentioned
above). The tension
gone, you can now sit back and relax as the music wends its way to a
triumphant, and very Beethovian, C major ending.
Other Internet Resources
Recordings
Bibliography